翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Complete glucose breakdown
・ Complete graph
・ Complete Greatest Hits
・ Complete Greatest Hits (Foreigner album)
・ Complete Greatest Hits (The Cars album)
・ Complete group
・ Complete Heyting algebra
・ Complete History Volume One
・ Complete History Volume Two
・ Complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial
・ Complete icosahedron
・ Complete Idiot's Guides
・ Complete income reporters
・ Complete Index to World Film
・ Complete information
Complete intersection
・ Complete intersection ring
・ Complete Last Live
・ Complete lattice
・ Complete linkage
・ Complete Linux Installer
・ Complete list of authors published as UK first editions by Collins Crime Club
・ Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
・ Complete list of Rock Band Network songs
・ Complete Live at the Spotlight Club 1958
・ Complete Madness
・ Complete Mage
・ Complete market
・ Complete Me
・ Complete measure


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Complete intersection : ウィキペディア英語版
Complete intersection

In mathematics, an algebraic variety ''V'' in projective space is a complete intersection if the ideal of V is generated by exactly ''codim V'' elements. That is, if ''V'' has dimension ''m'' and lies in projective space ''P''''n'', there should exist ''n'' − ''m'' homogeneous polynomials
:''F''''i''(''X''0, ..., ''X''''n''), 1 ≤ ''i'' ≤ ''n'' − ''m'',
in the homogeneous coordinates ''X''''j'', which generate all other homogeneous polynomials that vanish on V.
Geometrically, each ''F''''i'' defines a hypersurface; the intersection of these hypersurfaces should be ''V''. The intersection of ''n''-''m'' hypersurfaces will always have dimension at least ''m'', assuming that the field of scalars is an algebraically closed field such as the complex numbers. The question is essentially, can we get the dimension down to ''m'', with no extra points in the intersection? This condition is fairly hard to check as soon as the codimension ''n'' − ''m'' ≥ 2. When ''n'' − ''m'' = 1 then ''V'' is automatically a hypersurface and there is nothing to prove.
==Example of a space curve that is not a complete intersection==

A classic example is the twisted cubic in \mathbb^3: it is a set-theoretic complete intersection, i.e. as a set it can be expressed as the intersection of 2 hypersurfaces, but not an ideal-theoretic (or scheme-theoretic) complete intersection, i.e. its homogeneous ideal cannot be generated by 2 elements.
Its degree is 3, so to be an ideal-theoretic complete intersection it would have to be the intersection of two surfaces of degrees 1 and 3, by the hypersurface Bézout theorem. In other words, it would have to be the intersection of a plane and a cubic surface. But by direct calculation, any four distinct points on the curve are not coplanar, so it cannot lie in a plane, ruling out the only possible case. The twisted cubic lies on many quadrics, but the intersection of any two of these quadrics will always contain the curve plus an extra line, since the intersection of two quadrics has degree 2\times 2 = 4, and the twisted cubic has degree 3, so the only way to get degree 4 is to add a line.
On the other hand, the twisted cubic, as a set, is the intersection of the quadric surface x z - y^2 = 0 and the cubic surface z (y w - z^2) - w (x w - y z)=0 in \mathbb^3. Formally the degree of that intersection is 6, so in a more refined sense, the intersection is actually the twisted cubic counted with multiplicity two.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Complete intersection」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.